|
|
 |
Contraceptive device fails to prevent HIV
Kerry Cullinan. 13 July 2007. Health-E News. Republished courtesy of the Health-E News Service.
|
The diaphragm contraceptive device does not help to prevent HIV infection, according to the results of a three-year trial published in the Lancet today (Fri 13 July 07).
The trial involved 5 000 women in Soweto, Durban and Harare, but found no difference in HIV infection between women given both condoms and the diaphragm and those given just condoms.
?“Unfortunately, the results do not support the addition of the diaphragm to the use of condoms in current HIV prevention strategies. To date, condoms remain the only proven barrier method for HIV prevention,?” said Dr. Guy de Bruyn of the Perinatal HIV Research Unit of the University of the Witwatersrand, a principal investigator for the study.
The diaphragm, a rubber dome-shaped disk that is inserted over the cervix and used with a lubricant, has been used by women for decades as a contraceptive device. However, the study has dashed hopes that it could also offer women protection against HIV.
During the study, 76 out of 742 Durban women became HIV infected in the group that received condoms only, and 72 out of 743 women became HIV infected in the group that received the diaphragm, lubricant and condoms.
At the Soweto site, 23 out of 505 women became HIV infected in the condom only group, and 24 out of 503 women became HIV infected in the diaphragm and condom group.
In Harare, 52 out of 1229 women in the condom only became HIV infected while 62 out of 1226 became HIV infected in the diaphragm and condom group.
?“In the context of the comprehensive HIV prevention package provided to all participants, the trial found no additional benefit against HIV infection from the diaphragm and lubricant in the intervention arm,?” said the trial?’s lead investigator, Dr Nancy Padian, director of the Women?’s Global Health Imperative at the University of California, San Francisco.
Both the trial (condom and diaphragm) and control (condom only) groups were extensively counselled on safer sex, how to use male condoms and on the importance of treating sexually transmitted infections to reduce the risk of HIV.
The up-side of the failed trial is that the extensive counselling of the 5000 women led to all of them using condoms more often than they usually would, and more often than the norm in their communities ?– and thus probably resulted in fewer of the trial participants getting HIV.
The MIRA (Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa) trial was conducted by the Women?’s Global Health Imperative in partnership with the Perinatal HIV Research Unit, the Medical Research Council of South Africa, the University of Zimbabwe, and Ibis Reproductive Health. |
| Was this article helpful to you? |
 ?67%???? ?33%
|
|
Back
|
|
|
|
